Abstract 
Objective: Religious propagators in cyberspace face various ethical conflicts, and making appropriate decisions in these cases requires careful consideration of the rational and religious arguments surrounding the doubts and conflicts. The aim of this paper is to resolve four cases of ethical conflicts faced by propagators in this space. 
Methodology: Data collection and identification of ethical conflicts were conducted using field and library methods. To address these conflicts, an analytical-ijtihad approach was employed, relying on reasoning and inference. 
Findings: This article examines four cases of ethical conflicts encountered by religious propagators. The first conflict arises between the necessity of conducting flow analysis for doubt resolution and the need to avoid dubious spaces. The second conflict is between the necessity of religious propagation and responding to doubts, and the need to avoid mingling with non-mahrams in private spaces. The third conflict involves the necessity of religious propagation and the need to prevent wasting time and life. The fourth conflict occurs between the necessity of content creation and exploration in cyberspace and the need to avoid obscene images. 
Discussion and Conclusion: By examining the arguments surrounding each conflict, it was concluded that the first conflict is hypothetical and does not occur in practice. In the second and third conflicts, the necessity of propagation takes precedence over its common harms, and practical suggestions are provided to mitigate these harms. The fourth conflict can also be resolved by clarifying the ruling on looking at such images.